Pari-mutuel horse racing meets are designed to be a partnership.  The partners are the racetracks that provide the physical facilities where the racing occurs, the horse owners who provide the horses that compete in the races and the horseplayers who provide the betting capital.
 
The betting capital creates the handle that funds the takeout which becomes revenue to the state, the track (and their pari-mutuel betting outlets) and the horse owners. The money that remains after the takeout, is the net pool and most of that gets distributed back to the horseplayers in the form of winnings. 

The racetracks need the horseplayers' money to survive.  Some of the owners need the horseplayers' money to survive (some owners are independently wealthy and their involvement in horse racing is for reasons other than profit).  Presumably, the horseplayers need their winnings in order to survive! 

Over the years betting handle has been increasing even though other barometers of horse racing economics have been in decline. This means that the

funding engine for the tracks and the horse owners has continued purring along.  Purses and Handle Rise.
Numerous political and financial actions have resulted in more purse money and subsidies for horse owners and more income for racetrack owners.  When slot machines are authorized and installed, the resulting revenue is split among the state, racetrack owners and horse owners.  They all get more.  What do the horseplayers get? 

Do we see any attempts by any of the industry's controlling interests to share their good fortune with the horseplayers by a reduction in takeout? 

Do we see any attempts by any of the industry's controlling interests to share their good fortune with the horseplayers by overhaul, indeed elimination, of that arcane practice of payoff breakage? 

What we do see is an industry whose controlling interests take for granted and treat with general indifference their lifeblood:  Their customers, the horseplayers.  Take a look at this little gem:
All this fuss over horseplayers' money....and no mention of horseplayers!

HORSEPLAYERS'
PROTEST SITE

The big horseowner group, THG, now wants to meet with the major racetracks' representative, the NTRA, to discuss the ADW mess.  (See article)  Meanwhile, Calder has gotten some resolution in its struggle with the horseowners so that it can simulcast its races to out-of-state simulcast sites.  However, the ADW mess there has still not been resolved.  (See article)  And, you may remember that Calder raised its takeout by 3-POINTS when it lowered its purses in the initial go round with the horsemen.  Well guess what?  That elevated takeout is still in play!  We just pay and pay and pay.
When will horseplayers' stop funding this madness?
(See "High Takeout" for the latest gambit by New York.)